The global warming scare is back.
And as it does every time, it’s getting worse.
As global temperatures rise, there is a real risk that the world could get too hot.
But as the US Senate committee on the environment and public works is set to hold a hearing on Tuesday on whether to move forward with a global warming deal, it seems like we can expect a lot more chatter about global warming.
How to deal with the global warming panic The climate is changing, but the answer is different.
Here are some key points.
We’re getting hotter The hottest month in recorded history was in April, with the average temperature reaching 39.6C.
And while the temperature could still go up, the average annual rate of warming since the end of the last ice age has fallen from 1.4C per decade to 1.1C.
There’s a real chance that our planet could get hotter than we’ve ever seen before.
There is a huge opportunity There are lots of good things about global climate change.
In particular, the Earth is warming.
And it’s not just the amount of heat it produces, but also how much of it is being absorbed into the atmosphere.
The ocean, the land, and the air are all changing and absorbing more of it.
So the amount that can be absorbed by the atmosphere and then radiated back out to space is also changing.
That means that we’re getting warmer.
But we can make a big difference.
A few things need to happen.
One is to reduce emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.
2 The world is currently adding about 1.5C of CO 2 to the atmosphere every year, so we need to reduce our emissions.
We also need to make sure we don’t overshoot the climate threshold that we need for a 1C rise.
And we need a big push to get the planet to be a lot warmer than it is now.
But these things won’t happen overnight.
The Earth’s climate has been in a constant state of warming for the last 100,000 years, and it’s likely to continue to do so.
This means that our chances of hitting a tipping point where the world is no longer able to sustainably grow food and absorb CO2 are slim.
But there is good news.
There are two ways to deal.
The first is to make some really big changes to how we use energy.
We have the world’s biggest and most powerful economies.
And the biggest of them is China.
China produces about 80 per cent of all the CO 2 it produces.
Its population is growing faster than the rest of the world.
And there’s good reason to believe that it could eventually produce all of the energy it needs to keep growing at a rate that matches its economic growth.
And its energy efficiency policies could make the world a lot greener, too.
A second option is to take a more aggressive approach.
This is the one that is less clear.
It’s possible to limit CO2 emissions by shifting towards zero emissions.
But this is more difficult than it sounds.
A zero-emissions scenario has many problems.
The idea is to have zero emissions in 2050.
Then the world would still be burning some of the biggest sources of CO that we have, and even if we did get a big rise in temperatures, there would still not be enough to compensate.
A major problem is that the Earth would continue to warm, and if we get too warm, the CO2 would leak into the air and the oceans.
A global solution This option is not very likely.
The world’s major emitters, China, India, and Brazil, are all trying to stay below the 1.7C threshold that will make them both weathervanes and possible climate refugees.
But if they want to keep warming to a level that is acceptable for a while, they’ll have to cut their emissions by around half.
And that would leave them with a massive hole in their carbon budgets.
So they could do that if they wanted to.
But it’s also possible that China, for instance, could be able to limit its emissions while keeping warming below 1.8C.
In this case, the rest would have to be done on the international stage.
That is, if countries like China and India could agree to cut emissions while still maintaining a high temperature threshold, then they would have a lot of leverage over other countries.
But that would require agreeing to more stringent targets for their own emissions.
If the world was to take this approach, it would require the United States to cut its emissions significantly.
And in order to get there, we’d need to take significant steps to help China and other countries reduce their emissions.
We need a global economic plan We know that China has an ambitious climate policy.
But China also has a lot to learn from the US.
It has a large,